https://z5h64q92x9.net/proxy_u/ru-en.en/colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2994793.html
colonelcassad
- 5 Oct, 22:28
In the sequel to http://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/2988083.html
there were pictures https://twitter.com/JosephHDempsey/status/783714272568279040 American hybrid catamaran leased to the UAE, which was struck by a missile Huthis in the Red sea on 1 October.
Injuries seem very serious and the fact that the ship will not be restored – according to the burnt-out cabin, and inside was a serious fire. I wonder if the incoming hole in the bow to determine the type of missile which was fired at the catamaran?
PS. Among the crew members were Ukrainianshttp://www.thenational.ae/uae/crew-members-of-uae-ship-attacked-by-the houthis-tell-of-terrifying-raid (in the link they talk about the details of the attack). Remarkably, one of the crew members said that when the crew tried to escape from the burning ship, within half an hour were under small arms fire from a small boat.
Crew members of UAE ship attacked by Houthis tell of terrifying raid
ABU DHABI // Oleksandr Lukianov was in his cot aboard the Swift when a loud blast from a higher deck startled him from his slumber.
Before the Ukrainian could speculate on the cause, the ship tilted sharply to one side, tossing him to the ground as a steel wardrobe and other furniture collapsed around him in the darkness.
It is possible Mr Lukianov, 31, lost consciousness because the next thing he remembers is being shaken awake by his shipmates.
“They said ‘Oleks, wake up, wake up’,” he said. “‘Oleks, Oleks, they are shooting’.”
The crew of 24 young men on the ship – owned by the UAE’s National Marine Dredging Company and used to ferry humanitarian aid to Yemen – was attacked by Houthi rebels while they slept.
The ship was sailing through the Bab Al Mandeb Strait when its observation tower was destroyed in what crew members said was a missile strike.
When Mr Lukianov ran from his room, he could see the bridge “was completely destroyed by fire”.
He added: “We heard some shooting, but we could not understand from which side. There was some noise but we could not understand from which side they were moving.
“The messroom was completely destroyed. We were afraid because if you don’t die from fire, you could die from a bullet.”
Michal Czubakowski, the Polish first officer, said most of the crew were in their rooms when the ship was attacked at about 3am. Three of them were working on the observation deck and two were in the engine room.
“First impression for everybody was just a collision with another ship because nobody expects such a thing,” said Mr Czubakowski, 34.
“But suddenly there was an alarm, and the duty engineer and the second mate were running around and they were just screaming that we were hit by a rocket.”
The force from the blast pushed the vessel to the side, causing furniture and storage cabinets to topple, in some cases injuring the crew.
The men tried to help one another while escaping from their rooms and evading gunfire, said Mr Czubakowski. Most of the doors had been blocked by fallen furniture or ceilings.
“We were trying to help each other, just going door to door to check if somebody was inside,” he said.
Shailendra Kumar, an Indian who sustained facial injuries from the falling furniture, said he ran outside after hearing the blast and saw some colleagues had been bloodied in the commotion.
As he saw flames shooting from the front of the ship, he and others ran towards the back and saw people firing from a small boat. The gunfire continued for half an hour, said Mr Kumar, 33.
“I was very scared and I laid down on the floor,” he added.
After the shooting stopped, the crew of the Swift set out to launch a lifeboat as they waited for rescue. The UAE Navy and Coastguard arrived about an hour or two after the missile strike.
Mr Kumar was visibly shaken on Tuesday as he spoke about the ordeal. He and his crewmates are recovering in the UAE, where they have been given medical care, clean clothes and shelter.
“I was thinking that we were going to lose our lives,” said the father of two. “It was very sad. We never thought that we would come back again.”
http://www.hisutton.com/HVS-2%20Swift%20hit.html
UAE’s Swift fast transport hit by missile
The UAE’s Swift fast transport was struck by a rebel missile on 1st October 2016. Since the incident on 1-2nd October a clearer picture of the attack has begun to emerge. Main conclusions:- Portions of the video footage released of the attack was actually from a previous attack. However, the missile employed is still thought to be an anti-ship missile
- Houthi forces have launched multiple attacks with anti-ship missiles but this is the first recorded significant success
- The impact and damage is consistent with an anti-ship missile. Significant blast from the impact left large exit holes on the other side of the bow at the same level as the entry hole (from Starboard to Port). This suggests a sea-skimming profile
- The fireball immediately after the missile impact suggests a jet propelled C802 where unspent jet fuel acts as an accelerant, rather than a rocket propelled C801 or smaller anti-tank missile
- It is unlikely that any Yemeni Navy C801 missiles are still serviceable
- Therefore, missiles from the C802 family have been supplied to the Houthi rebels. The most likely sources in Iran.
- Iran may see the supply of the missile as low risk because of the ambiguity created by Yemen’s previous operation of C801. The C802 is the same missile believed to have been used by Hezbollah during the attack on INS Hanit in 2006. On that occasion the target had a lucky escape although there were casualties. However, Iran may now see the supply of anti-ship missiles (C802 or similar) as an effective strategy to maximize the impact of its foreign policy.
Although arguably not a military target, the attack points to possible failings in intelligence and OPSEC which resulted in a major military blunder.
Swift
Swift is a modified civilian type catamaran hulled fast ferry designed by Incat in Australia. She features wave-piercing bows and has a lightweight aluminum hull. She was built for the US Military Sealift Command (MSC) and entered service on a lease basis in 2003. Her contract expired in 2013 and she was subsequently leased to the UAE’s National Marine Dredging Company who used her to transport aid and supplies in and out of Yemen.
Attack
A video released by Houthi rebels on 1st October appears to evidence that Swift was tracked both visually and by radar in the lead-up to the attack. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WTNeEYlO3Iw)
The rebels filmed the impact from a small boat trailing the Swift. The boat continued filming as it passed very close and crossed the bow of the stationary Swift. The bow and bridge were engulfed in flames.
Likely missile: C802 Noor
This footage, which was presented as the missile launch against the Swift, has actually been released before in October 2015 when the Houthi’s also claimed to have attacked and sunk a Saudi-led coalition ship. In that instance they do not appear to have hit anything. However, it is reasonable to think that the latest attack is part of the same chain of events and that this ‘stock footage’ of a Houthi missile launch is representative of the weapon used in the attack on the Swift.The launch angle, booster burn time (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5FHfz0NueE) and missile lifting slightly after booster separation seen in the rebel video are all consistent with the C802 Noor missile.
The C802 is a Chinese designed export anti-ship missile based similar to the YJ-8 series of missiles. It has been further developed and produced in large numbers in Iran as the Noor. This family is analogous to Exocet and Harpoon, and carries a 155kg high explosive warhead at high subsonic speeds. Maximum range is 100km (54nm) but more crucially, minimum range is 10km (5nm). This effectively precludes the small boat following the Swift as the launch platform.
It can be launched from fast boats (larger than ~15m (~50ft) in length), but more likely from a truck onshore. The Noor is typically guided by a search radar mounted on the launch platform before switching to its own active radar homing in the terminal phase of the attack. For longer range shots beyond the range of the launch platform’s radar, it requires off-platform information and mid-course guidance. This mode is inherently more complicated and is considered unlikely in this case.C801 missile?
An alternative hypothesis being considered is that the missile was a C801 which could be from Yemeni Navy stocks. There is currently some debate among analysts as to whether the video shows the C802 (as suggested here) or the rocket powered C801. Points toconsider:- The launch footage (from a previous occasion) suggests the turbojet powered C802 although others suggest it is a C801. I would expect the C801’s second (sustainer) phase motor to burn brighter and for longer than in the video.
- The C801s were supplied in 1995 so would be over 20 years old now. Solid propellants degrade over time and the C801s are likely passed their use-by date.
- The radar shown in the video is more modern than that which would have been supplied with C801.
The Yemeni Navy operated the C801 to equip their three Chinese built Type-021 Hounan missile boats. The missiles were carried in armored box launchers which are different from the lightweight containers used for the folding-fin C802. Reports that Yemeni Type-021s were equipped with the older and larger YJ-1 based anti-ship missiles are in error.
Photos of Yemeni Type-021s before delivey from ChinaOne Type-021 craft is still mobile, being based in Hodeida. It has not have had its missile containers since at least 2011.
The other two Type-021s have been sinking at their moorings in Aden since spring 2015, and had been immobile since spring 2014. They are not visible in Google Earth imagery with missile containers fitted since 2004.
What we can be relatively sure of therefore, is that if it was a Yemeni Navy C801 then it wasn’t launched from a Type-021 missile boat. All three Type-021s have had their missile containers removed for several years. The status of the weapons, or even whether any remain, is unconfirmed. It is plausible that it could be adapted for shore use but the rounds would be too old to be reliale.
The radar screen shown in the Houthi video (above) is different from the one sometimes associated with the Iranian Noor system (below). It shows a 360 degree sweep while the Noor’s only covers the frontal arc of the launch platform. It is possible that the radar is not from the launch platform, or that they used a different radar than the one observed with Noor. Analysts will be able to identify the radar system and probably its location from the few seconds of footage in the video.
If it is the C802, then the Houthi rebels must have received the missile from Iran or her proxies.
Damage
The swift was extensively damaged but has remained afloat, and with much of the cargo area and stern appearing minimally damaged. It is unclear whether she will be repaired.The Swift is reportedly being towed to Eritrea, where UAE has a naval presence in Assab.
The Fourth Revolutionary War 