Dugin’s Guideline – Suffragism and Feminism


In 1944 on this day, October 5, women in France for the first time officially allowed to participate in elections.

Look how pervert false Western propaganda events in world history. When it comes to women’s rights and about feminism we immediately think of the West European society – a model of freedom and equality. Suffragism, that is, the struggle of women for the fact that they were given the right to vote in elections to the Parliament and to participate in referendums, indeed, originated in Europe and in the United States in the 19th century.But these attempts to force women to recognize themselves as full citizens brutally suppressed – like the speech of the blacks against apartheid or industrial workers protesting against oppression and exploitation. So here’s to a prosperous, democratic, developed and progressive Europe – indeed in the most democratic and most progressive country of France is the vanguard of civil society and human rights-is to 5 Oct 1944 women in terms of political rights were equal to livestock, to the silent object of consumption or a servant.

Agree that this fact somehow falls out of the liberal mantra about how the West was ahead of the wretched and backward Russia. So, France mid-20th century. Joyful French women first get the right to vote. The question of whether a person is a woman – in the political sense – has finally been solved. But what about before that? Until 5 Oct 1944 in progressive” Europe it was in doubt? It was in doubt. And these doubters teach us human rights and respect for the dignity of women?!

Now let’s go in reverse. In which European country do you think women first given the right to vote? In England? In Holland? Now the liberals should sit down for this: the right to vote women were for the first time in history granted in the Russian Empire. It happened in 1906, in the Grand Duchy of Finland. Before meet women in the world went to a New Zealand authorities. While in Switzerland, suffragism entered into force only in 1971, and Liechtenstein in 1984. So, in Europe, ahead of the women’s struggle for their rights sustainable leadership in the Russian Empire. I think that says it all, or almost all.

However, the question remains about how the women themselves need full equality with men. It is, however, quite another matter. In recent years, feminism has become more and more widespread phenomenon. Received the right to vote – again – for the first time in Europe in the Russian Empire – an improved spirit ladies began to extend their rights – not to stop. But here before emancipation women and male supporters of their emancipation, which, however, many men got a fundamental question: what is equality and how is it interpreted?

So there were different types of feminism. The first type of liberal. He believes that a woman should be a man. That is to perform men’s work, men’s job is to be a politician, a soldier, a boxer or a lumberjack. In my opinion, it’s not too charming. But liberal feminists know better.

The second type is post-modern. There are feminists noticed that the couple man-woman assumes a hierarchy. And avoid the relationship of master-slave can only actually depriving people of sex or making it dependent on the individual decisions. Hence, LGBT, transgender, and call all to become asexual cyborgs that defended the famous feminist Donna Haraway. Even less charming.

And finally, the cute – to me personally – the type of feminism – the so-called stand point feminism – feminism position. He insists that the women’s universe is different from that of men. Not worse, not better, neither the slave nor the master. Just us men, the female Universe, not understand. This is not stupidity or lack of, not the giddiness and hysteria, it is the mind, but completely different. And hence the struggle of women is not equality, and to be and to remain women – who made them God.

All the best, you were watching a Directive Dugin on suffragism and feminism.

In our society women are almost achieved those freedoms for which they fought. But what to do with them? And if they really wanted to? The question is open, and let women themselves decide it in accordance with your female logic. We better in this case not to interfere.
See the archive transmission – http://tsargrad.tv/


Stauffenberg was Right!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s