The destabilization of the Islamic world is the grand strategy of the US in order to eliminate any alternative poles to its hegemony. Russia, China, India, and the EU should be aware of this danger that is against multipolarity, and mediate between Sunnis and Shiites to avoid a civil war in the Islamic world while it is still in the preliminary stage. Muslim countries should seek dialogue and instead of using sectarian beliefs for their national interests, prefer peace and diplomacy to solve conflicts, focus on economic development to prevent poverty that feeds unrest among Muslims, democratize their political systems to represent different groups in their countries, and contribute to world civilization by interacting with other civilizations in terms of peace, diplomacy, economic, and cultural cooperation.
Exactly. This is what [Nikolai] Berdyaev spoke of: the return to the Middle Ages [in the book ‘The End Of Our Time’]. Returning to the Middle Ages or turning to them to look for inspiration, and I am not speaking of merely reproducing – that’s impossible to do. But we have stood on the path of modernity. We’ve stood on the path of modern totalitarianism regardless of whether of the first, second, or third theory. We’ve exhausted all of their possibilities, built all three models.
Heidegger once said: “It is in vain to wait the God or gods to come. He or they will not come. Because they wait for us to come and to prepare place for their Return.” To put the End to the everlasting Ending is our task. Not their. Our gods are different. But the enemy of all gods is the same. The Titans. Now they are on the edge of their highest point imaginable. But nothing could grow infinitely. Once comes the moment of the fall. This moment is near. But when? That may be depend on us.
Alain de Benoist is the leading thinker of the European ‘New Right’ movement, a school of political thought founded in France in 1968 with the establishment of GRECE (Research and Study Group for European Civilisation). To this day he remains its primary representative, even while rejecting the label ‘New Right’ for himself. An ethnopluralist defender of cultural uniqueness and integrity, he has argued for the right of Europeans to retain their identity in the face of multiculturalism, and he has opposed immigration, while still preferring the preservation of native cultures over the forced assimilation of immigrant groups. He has authored dozens of books and essays on topics such as immigration, religion, philosophy and political theory. In 1978, he received the Grand Prix de l’Essai from the Académie Française for his book ‘Vu de Droite’ [View from the Right].
Well I think that the election of Trump first means it is possible to oppose the global agenda planned by the oligarchy using the existing rigged political system. This was I guess the main surprise for everybody especially in European countries. This is also a clear defeat for a global and increasing power: the Mainstream Media Corporation that did its maximum to make so that Hillary Clinton win this battle. After the Brexit, Trump … It’s now getting more and more obvious for everybody that they lie and will lie and lie to protect their own interest, far from the interest of the people.
The establishment of a natural geopolitical phenomena, a Moscow-Berlin-Paris axis based on sovereignty, identity, realist continentalism, and Traditional Christian values (I say ‘Traditional’ to distinguish these from bourgeois pseudo-Christianity) would provide Russia with its necessary security, but more importantly could be achieved without the evils of occupation and without the threat of nuclear war.
You may recall that between the Thai monarchy and the Russian monarchy traditionally had very close ties. After all, the Russian monarchy was in its sacral roots, only in a different, Christian sense. But in our Orthodox tradition, the monarch, the king has the spiritual metaphysical significance. He is also the guarantor of the metaphysical religious legitimacy of the political system. Even the official national anthem of Thailand was written in 1888, Russian composer Surowski. So far it is the anthem of the Royal house of Thailand and sounds today during the ascent to the throne of the new Thai monarch. His coronation is held under Russian music.
From a geopolitical point of view the picture in Yemen is very clear: as elsewhere, the Shiites – in this case, the Yemeni Houthis defend the civilization of the land, while their opponents – the Wahhabis, al-Qaeda and the Saudis are, as everywhere, the puppets of the Sea of civilization, globalization and Atlanticism, protecting the interests of American Swamps. Therefore, the choice of our policy towards Yemen is clear: we have to be completely, firmly on the side of the Houthis against Hadi, al-Qaeda and the Saudis. Because in Syria, we are in a deadly war with this force. Therefore, Yemen will be ours, if it is Shiite.This means, the great and sovereign. Truly independent.
The belief has been instilled in us that there is no ideology in the West, that a pluralism of positions and convictions reigns there, and that everyone there is free to believe, think, speak, and do whatever they want. This is an absolute lie, a simple propagandistic ploy borrowed from the Cold War arsenal (a war against us). In fact, there is a dominant ideology in the West which is no less totalitarian or intolerant than any other ideology. Only its forms and principles are peculiar, its philosophical roots different, and its historical basis differing from those ideologies which are more familiar to us. This is the ideology of liberalism. It is based on the dogma of the “autonomous individual”, i.e., consistent individualism, “applied rationalism,” faith in technological progress, the notion of the “open society,” and the introduction of the “market” and “free trade” principle into not only the economic, but also the ideological, social, and philosophical absolute.
If and only if the Russian Government marshals itself in the direction which is opposite of the American petty bourgeois view or mentality of economic greed and gratification, as well as the bourgeois designs for imperial hegemony as is the constant pattern of the various United States regimes in the modern era, will the Russian military succeed in its long war against American imperialism.
Finally, the sixth, unscheduled lesson of Carl Schmitt can be called an example of what the leader of the European New Right, Alain de Benoist, calls “political imagination” or “ideological creativity.” The geniality of the German jurist lies in that he not only felt the “field lines” of history but also heeded the mysterious voice of essence, even though it is often hidden behind the bland, empty phenomena of the complex and dynamic modern world. We Russians should learn from Teutonic stiffness in setting our bottomless and overvalued institutions into clear intellectual formulas, clear ideological projects, and convincing and compelling theories.
Why the US activity in the area of our direct strategic interests? There are several reasons. After Brexit there is a clear weakening of the Atlanticists – with all the pressure from Washington, the British withdrew from the EU and weaken Europe’s Anglo-Saxon influence. This strengthens the position of continental European forces, and, most importantly, it again underscores the importance of Russia as an alternative pole. It becomes obvious to all. Therefore, the Americans began to fuss and began to carry out an audit of its anti-Russian vassals – as if they did not succumb to the tranquil charm of a sovereign Russia. Moreover, the statements of Jean-Claude Juncker that an alien civilization is extremely disappointed with the EU, has finally demonstrated: the European Union, with its tolerance for Mcdonalds and other satanic perversions has finally lost the last vestiges of rationality and become really scary.
What was the Warsaw Pact from a geopolitical point of view? It was a defense system constructed in Europe with the great Patriotic war. For the liberation of Eastern Europe our ancestors shed rivers of blood and sacrificed millions of lives. A wide belt of the East European countries, which were formerly voluntarily or by force in the German campaign against the Soviet Union, was after our victory in the area of our influence. Perfectly reasonable and we combined them into a single strategic unit.In order to protect our borders within a reasonable distance from the vital centers of the nation itself – the USSR. This was our line of defense. And we had to keep the Warsaw Treaty Organization until recently.
Therefore from a geopolitical point of view everything is clear. Clearly the Japanese and especially the Russian leadership. We have in the issue of rapprochement with Japan in the peace Treaty are no obstacle – neither objective nor subjective. In this respect, Moscow is fully sovereign. That, alas, can not say about Tokyo. But if we at least a little progress in that matter, it will be a very significant achievement for both countries. And a serious blow for the Americans, which, however, it is time to put in place. And the Pacific is a good reason. Let one of its seas to be called the Russo-Japanese.And will be a zone free from American military presence.
In parallel to the NATO exercise Anaconda, NATO is conducting exercises together with the Scandinavian countries Norway and Finland and Sweden which are not NATO and the Baltic States. The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia Sergey Lavrov expressed in this regard concern the maneuvers of NATO near the Russian borders, and warned to take appropriate defensive measures the nature of the response.
The disintegration of the USSR signified, from a geopolitical point of view, an event of colossal importance, affecting the entire structure of the global geopolitical map. According to its geopolitical features, the confrontation of the West and East, the capitalist camp and socialist one, with its core in the USSR, represented the peak of the deep process of the great war of the continents, a planetary duel between the civilization of Land and the civilization of the Sea, raised to the highest degree of intensity and to a planetary scale. The entire preceding history led to the tense apogee of this battle, which received precisely in 1991 its qualitative resolution. In this moment, together with the death of the USSR, the collapse of the civilization of Land was realized
Speaking to the Tasnim News Agency, Salim Harba said the recent meeting between Iranian Defense Minister Brigadier General Hossein Dehqan and his Russian and Syrian counterparts, Sergey Kuzhugetovich Shoygu and Fahd Jassem al-Freij was a serious negotiation, which indicated the “strategic stability” of the three allies at military levels.
“Secondly, the meeting demonstrated the insistence of Russia, Iran and Syria on continuing to fight against terrorism and prepare the grounds for the political process,” he noted.
The Syrian analyst further emphasized that the talks in Tehran will lead to new tactics and coordination among the three countries’ forces at all levels in coming days.
In short, President Putin is taking into consideration a complex series of global developments and opportunities. He will act decisively, but not in haste. The Russian military intervention in Syria, launched last September, has stabilized the Assad regime and seen the Syrian Army rebuilt into a far more effective fighting force. Putin has also seen that Iran’s effectiveness in Syria has proven to be over-rated. When Russia pulled back some of its military support for the Assad government earlier this year, anticipating that Iran would be able to fill that vacuum, it proved not to be the case. Russia is now quietly back in Syria on a scale equal to the peak of the late 2015 intervention.
To Eurasianism in Russia there is simply no alternative. Any other ideology is certainly weaker, more flawed and worse. But this is why Eurasians are in this merciless war.